January 5, 2007
Louisville cheerleader shows pom-poms
First and foremost - if you are at work, stop now. Nothing I'm about to reveal is work safe. If there are children and/or spouses nearby, then click away. Do not click on the following links if you are under 18 or not comfortable with what some/many may consider to be porn. You have been warned!
For those of you who have ever given a moment's thought to what college football cheerleaders do when they're not on the sidelines (and don't lie - you know you have!), here's a glimpse into the innermost details of one blond Louisville cheerleader's private life (NSFW). Very innermost and very private.
Hat Tip: Evan
Comments:
C-DOGG said:
posted on January 5, 2007 6:16 PM — 76.188.148.131 — link — abuse?
I'm at a lost for words......Well, that should help Louisville move up quickly on the rivals/scout.com recruiting chart. Also, this will help her remain jobless...even with a college degree. Then again Bangbros is always hiring! ;o)
geauxtigers0107 said:
posted on January 5, 2007 9:41 PM — 69.1.170.58 — link — abuse?
This definitely isn't new so I don't fault you Kev. I got this in email about 4 months ago. According to the email, her ex is stationed in Iraq. These pics were made for his viewing pleasure while he was on tour. Well, she got tired of waiting and dumped him before he even came back so he opted for a little revenge. Thus the public (or should I say pubic) pics of the lovely honey wearing nothing but a smile.
T-Mac said:
posted on January 5, 2007 10:24 PM — 66.78.139.117 — link — abuse?
Matt, chill bro. There are quite a few threads you can jump in on here and discuss football. Calm down. I sense your blood pressure has gone up and then you get dizzy and pass out and it'll be a big mess and we don't want that bro.
T-Mac said:
posted on January 6, 2007 12:15 AM — 66.78.139.117 — link — abuse?
Everybody relax. Kev said from the beginning if you aren't comfortable viewing certain thing's than do not click on the link. Kinda like TV. If you can't stand what is on then change the channel. Plain and simple. If you read the heading and are uncomfortable looking at a hot chick then that is no fault of Kev's. I personally don't see the problem. Hell, were all men here right?
Zac said:
posted on January 6, 2007 12:20 AM — 65.31.228.13 — link — abuse?
Kevin: Understand this. I'm all for freedom of the press; I don't believe in censorship. GatorGreg is right; if we don't like it, we can all blog somewhere else. Admittedly, I don't like it, but I'm not insulted by it; it's not what I joined this site for. That having been said, my concern is this: How many kids below the age of 18 have access to this site. As I write this, there could be six and seven year olds checking her out. Likely, the parents of these kids would be insulted. The damage now having been done, what then? My suggestion, if you're going to continue to do this on occasion, establish the link where-by proof of age is required.
T-Mac said:
posted on January 6, 2007 12:21 AM — 66.78.139.117 — link — abuse?
Diggs, you the man! I don't get it either bro. It clearly states that if you are offended than do not click on the link. Obviously, everybody who got offended knew that it was porn and still chose to look at it. Aside from the little weiner in a couple of the pics I think they are good. I'm gonna print a few off and have em for the spank bank. Hey, I am single.
The Mayor said:
posted on January 6, 2007 12:32 AM — 24.7.54.200 — link — abuse?
No T-mac, there are some bloggers on this site who aren't male or even of age.
You may change your mind about this stuff when you have a daughter of your own.
Nothing wrong with porn in my mind, just not on a site that has 12 year old fans participating.
T-Mac said:
posted on January 6, 2007 12:46 AM — 66.78.139.117 — link — abuse?
Mayor, first, if I offended you then I sincerely apologize to you. You know me by now and that I'm respectful, but at times I can be a comedian. I had absolutely no idea that people posting on here weren't adults. Well, except for So Cal. All that being said, it clearly states that if you are under 18 or not comfortable with what some may consider porn than do not click on the link. How come the people who got offended chose to click on the link?
Diggs the Mountie said:
posted on January 6, 2007 12:53 AM — 68.48.90.248 — link — abuse?
I don't mean to offend any either....... Like I said in post#9... "I don't mind the change of pace". But, don't get me wrong seeing this everyday on Fanblogs would get really old... really fast. I just figured I'd try to make light of the situation also...ya know with my comments?
Regan said:
posted on January 6, 2007 1:03 AM — 152.163.100.196 — link — abuse?
I don't mind. What else is going on in CFB right now?
- Saban to Bama
- LSU beat ND
- Ohio State/FloridaAll been done to death and there are plenty of threads to kick the dead horse around even more...
I really hate the layover until January 7, geez this is boring.
BTW, Kev - good selection for the pic to include on the thread...I dunno if any of the others would have flown :)
GatorMatt said:
posted on January 6, 2007 1:35 AM — 70.171.43.50 — link — abuse?
That girl definately had some roast beef curtains. I'm not complaining however. I think this was a good topic to mix things up a little. I have a strong feeling that the people complaining are either gay or Notre Dame fans (same thing)
geauxtigers0107 said:
posted on January 6, 2007 8:26 AM — 69.1.170.58 — link — abuse?
I can't believe the people that are pissed about this thread. And 12 yr olds can access porn all over the web. A 12 yr old is gonna search porn directly, not - hey, let's go to a college football blog where all they talk about is football and see if they got some hot, naked chicks on there. UH.........no. doesn't work like that. A nice change of pace, definitely don't want to see the site go to that every day, but one a week to lighten the mood of some of the tight asses on here would be swweeeeeeeeeeettt!!! Thanks again Kev
Geaux Tigers
posted on January 6, 2007 9:06 AM — link — abuse?Kevin Donahue said:
Wow. Never expected some of these responses. Good points all around. I'll concede that this is our most "visible" topic thread ever. Gotta stretch the limits some times, though, if you want to go out with a bang.
posted on January 6, 2007 9:49 AM — link — abuse?
Bad pun. But, now that I think about it, it is January. Many know about the Rivals purchase in Jan 2006, which I can't go into. It's been a year, but I'm pretty sure I'll stick around for a little while. We'll see, I guess.
Cape Cod Tom '84 Rutgers said:
posted on January 6, 2007 10:28 AM — 24.218.208.81 — link — abuse?
Boys, this girl is smarter than you think. Why do you think she did this? It's not unlike something that Modanna or Vanessa Williams did.
Your witnessing the making of Americas' next youngest self made millionare. She'll probably be on David Letterman.
I bet playboy, hollywood, or Donald Trump will make her rich off this stunt. She's hot and her act is origional. Everyone is going to want to see this one. More cheerleaders will follow in her footsteps.
Mark my words. This one will leave all the bonehead critics out there sitting in their cubicles scratching their heads.
Just watch and see.
badgerballer said:
posted on January 6, 2007 10:11 PM — 70.58.185.144 — link — abuse?
I don't know how many of you on the board have children, especially boys. I happen to have two, and a girl. In my house I try to live by a very simple rule with my kids, our lives are transparent. I tell my kids, "you can do what I do". That is, you can eat whatever I eat, go where I go, know whom I know, drink what I drink, see what I see, etc.
Of course it is not possible to live by this rule 100% of the time, there are some things that fall out of bounds. But in my home, the internet is not one of them. I love college football. And am passing the passion on to my boys. I allow them onto my computer, they can visit any website I visit.
Yes, it is true that if I/we don't like it we can simply choose to blog elsewhere. However, I would hate to lose contact with a great community and great source of college pigskin information, conversation and healthy debate, over questionable 'adult' threads. This isn't a site with a content warning prior to entry. Its a college football site. Where my boy to venture in and surf into this thread, then I'd be forced to curtail my time here. And that would be a shame.
Let people that are looking for this type of content, go places where it is advertised and made available as the purpose for the existance of the site. Here, let's bash Saban, Norte Dame and the Badger-leaving-out-BCS.
My $.02.
5th of November said:
posted on January 7, 2007 1:18 AM — 172.165.140.36 — link — abuse?
Nobody ever called cheerleaders intelligent. However, we must not censor her right to freely express herself (much to my delight). After all, censorship is becoming America's favorite past-time. The US gov't (and their corporate friends), already detain protesters, ban books like "America Deceived" America Deceived (book) from Amazon and Wikipedia, and fire 21-year tenured, BYU physics professor Steven Jones because he proved explosives, thermite in particular, took down the WTC buildings. More importantly, does she have anymore pics?
tExpat 68 said:
posted on January 7, 2007 8:24 AM — 72.26.145.72 — link — abuse?
Amazing. You were warned about the contents of the post and the link. Yet, ALL of you clicked the link.
Now, you are moaning about the content? Yes, if you are complaining about the content, then you are a damn fool. Yes, a damn fool.
If you have rules about internet use in the house, or you find this type of content inappropriate for this site, then do not click on the link, you damn fool.
You damn fools, and there are too many on this thread, scare me. You may vote. You definitely drive. You would run a red light, get hit by oncoming traffic, then blame the other drivers. Blah. Blah.
Move along, you damn fools.
Cape Cod Tom '84 Rutgers said:
posted on January 7, 2007 11:12 AM — 24.218.208.81 — link — abuse?
Badgerballer;
Your're a good man and a great dad. But sex is everywhere and there's no getting around it. The world is different from when we were kids. Although I admire your ambition and intent, I think you are fighting a loosing battle.
I have five kids (young ones). I don't want them growing up too fast, however, they will learn more evil in school around their friends, as compared to what they may see here.
I hate the fact that the world is perverse and innocence is lost...but, I found this article germain to the college football world.
I feel better knowing what's going on in the world, as opposed to leaving my head burried in the sand and pretending things like this don't exist or never happened.
With this in mind, I respect your opinion, but don't agree with it.
If this were China, things like this would never happen. This is America. The government that runs this country has screwed it up royally.
I'm not talking about President Bush either. This country has been progessively going down the toilet for the past forty years. It just plain sucks.Maybe I'm full of sugar, but that's how I see it.
badgerballer said:
posted on January 7, 2007 4:24 PM — 71.221.103.158 — link — abuse?
In my opinion, it could be (successfully) argued that going off on a rant and calling people about whom one knows little or nothing, "damn fools" repeatedly, goes much farther towards making one look like a damn fool than the original actions of the first party.
The world is filled with opinions, my friend. I'd like to think that all I did above was offer mine, in a sincere, heart-felt way, that did not offend anybody. The discussion in this thread is healthy. Shutting down differing views benefits no one. If the way you react to thoughts and opinions which differ from yours is to begin hurling names, then you have much growing up to do.
I have never, ever, called anyone on this site (or any other) a name, nor will I. It is impossible for me to pass judgement regarding the type of person he/she is, or how they would react to a given set of circumstances in a traffic accident, based on their posting of a paragraph or two on an annonymus internet bulleting board. You would be well advised to learn the same.
I am not a fool, far from it. I am actually quite sensible. I am not moaning about the content, simply offering an opinion. This is a college football site. In my opinion, that's what should be discussed here. Simple. If you honestly cannot see my, or any other point of view - besides your own - then whom exactly is the fool is certainly debatable.
Please note that all comments are subject to the Fanblogs Comment Policy.
Zac said:
posted on January 5, 2007 6:11 PM — 65.31.228.13 — link — abuse?Pretty girl; I'll bet her family is just thrilled to death.
Kevin: Now, I'm not about to tell you what to write, but let's face it. This is junk!!! I know cheerleaders are a part of collegate sports, but howzabout we sticka to the game?