<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Arizona Football - Fanblogs.com</title>
<link>http://www.fanblogs.com/</link>
<description />
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:45:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=4.01</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 


<item>
<title>Updated 2008 Bowl Game Predictions</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>First and foremost, I need to offer up a confession. The last time I spit out my bowl game predictions - they stunk. Those things reeked worse than LSU's and Texas Tech's defense combined. Bad. Awful. Sorry, even. </p>

<p>But... the past is the past. THIS time, I think I got it right. (And I don't have any teams playing in more than one bowl!)</p>

<p>So... without further ado... my updated bowl game projections for games played through November 22, 2008.</p>

<p><br />
<em>Click here for the <a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/2008-2009bowls.php">complete 2008-2009 College Football Bowl Game Schedule</a></em></p>

<p><br />
BCS National Championship Game - Florida vs Oklahoma<br />
Fiesta Bowl - Texas vs USC<br />
Rose Bowl - Oregon State vs Penn State<br />
Sugar Bowl - Alabama vs Utah<br />
Orange Bowl - Boston College vs Cincinnati</p>

<p>New Mexico - Colorado State vs. Nevada<br />
St. Petersburg - Rutgers vs. Memphis<br />
Las Vegas - BYU vs. Arizona<br />
EagleBank - Clemson vs Navy<br />
New Orleans - Southern Miss vs Troy<br />
Poinsettia - TCU vs Fresno State*<br />
Hawaii - Hawaii vs Western Michigan*<br />
Motor City - Ball State vs Minnesota<br />
Meineke Car Care - UNC vs West Virginia<br />
Champs Sports - Miami vs Iowa<br />
Emerald - Maryland vs San Jose State*<br />
Independence - LaTech* vs U La-La*<br />
Papajohns.com - Pitt vs Arkansas State*<br />
Alamo - Northwestern vs Oklahoma State<br />
Humanitarian - Boise State vs Wake Forest<br />
Texas - Northern Illinois* vs Rice<br />
Holiday - Cal vs Missouri<br />
Armed Forces - Air Force vs Tulsa<br />
Sun - Oregon vs Notre Dame**<br />
Music City - Kentucky vs VaTech<br />
Insight - Wisconsin vs Kansas<br />
Peach/Chick-fil-A - LSU vs Georgia Tech<br />
Outback - Michigan State vs South Carolina<br />
Capital One - Ohio State vs Georgia<br />
Gator - Florida State vs Nebraska<br />
Cotton - Texas Tech vs Ole Miss<br />
Liberty - Houston vs Vandy<br />
International - UConn vs Buffalo<br />
GMAC - ECU vs Central Michigan</p>

<p><br />
* At large teams shown with asterisk when partner conference aren't projected to have enough eligible teams. <br />
** Yeah, I know. I said ND was a lock for the Gator. They suck and so do I. </p>

<p>The full <a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/2008-2009bowls.php">list of college football bowl games</a> is online. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007883.php" title="Comment on Updated 2008 Bowl Game Predictions">Comment on Updated 2008 Bowl Game Predictions...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/xTwra0EuY7U/007883.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007883.php</guid>
<category>NCAA</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:45:03 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007883.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Updated Bowl Game Projections</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, we've run down which teams are bowl eligible and which conferences have filled their bowl slots, so the only thing left to ponder are the updated bowl game projections. </p>

<p>So... without further ado... my updated bowl game projections for games played through November 8, 2008.</p>

<p></p>

<p><em>Click here for the complete <a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/2008-2009bowls.php">2008-2009 College Football Bowl Game Schedule</a></em></p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
New Mexico Bowl - San Jose State vs Colorado State</p>

<p>St. Petersburg Bowl - South Florida vs Houston</p>

<p>Pioneer Las Vegas - TCU vs Oregon</p>

<p>Eagle Bank Bowl - Virginia vs Navy</p>

<p>R+L Carriers New Orleans - Memphis vs Troy</p>

<p>San Diego County Credit Union Poinsettia - BYU vs Nevada</p>

<p>Sheraton Hawaii - Hawaii vs Stanford</p>

<p>Motor City - Central Michigan vs Illinois</p>

<p>Meineke Car Care - Cincinnati vs Maryland</p>

<p>Champs Sports - Virginia Tech vs Wisconsin</p>

<p>Emerald - Arizona vs Miami</p>

<p>Independence - Akron vs Florida International</p>

<p>PapaJohns.com - West Virginia vs. Florida Atlantic</p>

<p>Valero Alamo - Minnesota vs. Oklahoma State</p>

<p>Roady's Humanitarian - Boise State vs Boston College</p>

<p>Texas - Rutgers vs. Louisiana Tech</p>

<p>Pacific Life Holiday - Cal vs. Missouri</p>

<p>Bell Helicopter Armed Forces - Air Force vs Rice</p>

<p>Brut Sun - Oregon State vs. Nebraska</p>

<p>Gaylord Hotels Music City - Georgia Tech vs. Kentucky</p>

<p>Insight - Kansas vs. Northwestern</p>

<p>Chick-fil-A - Ole Miss vs North Carolina</p>

<p>Outback - Iowa vs South Carolina</p>

<p>Capital One - Georgia vs. Michigan State</p>

<p>Konica Minolta Gator - Wake Forest vs Notre Dame</p>

<p>AT&T Cotton - Oklahoma vs LSU</p>

<p>AutoZone Liberty - Tulsa vs. Vanderbilt</p>

<p>International - Connecticut vs. Western Michigan</p>

<p>GMAC - East Carolina vs. Ball State</p>

<p>Rose Bowl - Penn State vs. USC</p>

<p>FedEx Orange - Florida State vs. Utah</p>

<p>Allstate Sugar - Alabama vs. Pittsburgh</p>

<p>Tostitos Fiesta - Texas vs. Ohio State</p>

<p>BCS National Championship Game - Texas Tech vs. Florida</p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/bowl_games/007863.php" title="Comment on Updated Bowl Game Projections">Comment on Updated Bowl Game Projections...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/XwKlumwkbvI/007863.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/bowl_games/007863.php</guid>
<category>Bowl Games</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:18:05 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/bowl_games/007863.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Which teams are bowl eligible?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Now that we are mid-way through November's college football games, here's a look at which teams have enough wins to be eligible to play in a bowl game this season. </p>

<p><br />
<h4>Bowl Eligible Teams through 11-8-2008</h4><p><br />
<br><br />
<b>ACC</b> - 8 teams eligible<br />
FSU, Wake Forest, Maryland, Boston College, North Carolina, Virginia Tech, Miami, Georgia Tech</p>

<p><b>Big 12</b> - 7 teams eligible<br />
Missouri, Nebraska, Kansas, Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State</p>

<p><b>Big East</b> - 5 teams eligible<br />
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Connecticut, West Virginia, South Florida</p>

<p><b>Big 10</b> -6 teams eligible<br />
Michigan State, Penn State, Ohio State, Minnesota, Northwestern, Iowa</p>

<p><b>Conference USA</b> - 3 teams eligible<br />
East Carolina, Tulsa, Rice</p>

<p><b>Independents</b> - 1 team eligible<br />
Navy</p>

<p><b>MAC</b> - 3 teams eligible<br />
Ball State, Central Michigan, Western Michigan</p>

<p><strong>MWC</strong> - 4 teams eligible<br />
BYU, Utah, TCU, Air Force</p>

<p><strong>Pac10</strong> - 5 teams eligible<br />
USC, Arizona, Cal, Oregon, Oregon State</p>

<p><b>SEC</b> - 6 teams eligible<br />
Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, South Carolina, Alabama, LSU</p>

<p><strong>Sun Belt</strong> - 1 team eligible<br />
Troy</p>

<p><b>WAC</b> - 2 teams eligible<br />
Boise State, San Jose State</p>

<p><br />
For a complete list of <a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/2008-2009bowls.php">bowl game matchups by conference, dates, times, and television coverage</a>, check our <a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/2008-2009bowls.php">2008 bowl game schedule</a>. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/bowl_games/007858.php" title="Comment on Which teams are bowl eligible?">Comment on Which teams are bowl eligible?...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/Est2jE4e9LM/007858.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/bowl_games/007858.php</guid>
<category>Bowl Games</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:24:20 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/bowl_games/007858.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>What are the college football graduation rates?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The latest installment of the <a href="http://www.ncaa.org/wps/ncaa?ContentID=38485">NCAA's Graduation Success Rate</a> reports have been released for 2008. </p>

<p>The Graduation Success Rate measures how many players earned a four-year degree within a six-year window, accounting for both transfers into the footabll program as well as transfers out of the football program. </p>

<p>So how do the BCS schools stack up against one another? I'm glad you asked. </p>

<p><br />
<h3>2008 NCAA Graduation Success Rate for BCS Football Programs</h3><p></p>

<p>1. Notre Dame    94%<br />
2. Stanford    93<br />
T3. BC    92<br />
T3. Duke    92    <br />
T3. Northwestern    92<br />
6. Vanderbilt    91<br />
7. Wake Forest    83<br />
8. Texas Tech    79<br />
T9. Baylor    78<br />
T9. Nebraska    78<br />
T9. UNC    78<br />
T9. Penn State    78<br />
T13. UConn    77<br />
T13. Indiana    77<br />
T15. Colorado    75<br />
T15. Iowa    75<br />
T15. Syracuse    75<br />
T15. Virginia Tech    75<br />
19. Cincinnati    73<br />
T20. Illinois    70<br />
T20. Michigan    70<br />
T20. Miami    70<br />
T20. Rutgers    70<br />
24. Florida State    69<br />
T25. Clemson    68<br />
T25. Florida    68<br />
T25. Maryland    68<br />
T25. Wash State    68<br />
.........................................<br />
T29. Kansas State    67<br />
T29. Pitt    67<br />
31. Virginia    66<br />
T32. South Carolina    65<br />
T32. Washington    65<br />
T34. Oregon State    64<br />
T34. Ole Miss    63<br />
T34. Miss State    63<br />
T34. Purdue    63<br />
T34. West Virginia    63<br />
T34. Wisconsin    63<br />
T40. Okla State    62<br />
T40. UCLA    62<br />
42. Arizona State    60<br />
T43. N.C. State    59<br />
T43. Missouri    59<br />
45. Louisville    58<br />
46. Auburn    57<br />
T47. Kentucky    56<br />
T47. Texas A&M    56<br />
T47. South Florida    56<br />
T50. Alabama    55<br />
T50. Iowa State    55<br />
T52. LSU    54<br />
T52. Tennessee    54<br />
T52. USC    54<br />
T55. Cal    53<br />
T55. Oregon    53<br />
T55. Kansas    53<br />
58. Ohio State    52<br />
T58. Arkansas    52<br />
T60. Minnesota    51<br />
T60. Michigan State    51<br />
62. Texas    50<br />
T63. Georgia     48<br />
T63. Georgia Tech    48<br />
65. Oklahoma    46<br />
66. Arizona    41</p>

<p><br />
I wasn't surprised to see some of the finest academic institutions grabbing the top spots, but I was SHOCKED to see Texas Tech at #8. Kudos to the Red Raiders!</p>

<p>The average GSR scores of the six BCS conferences:</p>

<p>1. ACC........72.3<br />
2. Big East...67.4<br />
3. Big Ten....66 <br />
4. Big 12.....63.2<br />
5. Pac-10.....61.3<br />
6. SEC.........60.5</p>

<p><br />
For all the blustering about the Pac10's high academic standards, I would have expected one of those standards to be.... graduation. </p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007839.php" title="Comment on What are the college football graduation rates?">Comment on What are the college football graduation rates?...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/vheJjDKy55M/007839.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007839.php</guid>
<category>NCAA</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 07:17:34 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007839.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Sagarin: SEC is the fourth best conference</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Now that we are well into the midst of the conference schedules, it's time to take an updated look at <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc08.htm">Jeff's Sagarin's Conference ratings</a>. </p>

<p>The following are updated through October 27, 2008:</p>

<p><br />
<blockquote>1  BIG 12 (78.18)<br>2  BIG TEN (77.24)<br>3  ATLANTIC COAST (76.97)<br>4  SOUTHEASTERN (76.54)<br>5  PAC-10 (74.33)<br>6  BIG EAST (73.44)<br>7  MOUNTAIN WEST (70.27)<br>8  I-A INDEPENDENTS (67.33)<br>9  WESTERN ATHLETIC (65.57)<br>10  MID-AMERICAN (65.18)<br>11  CONFERENCE USA (63.31)<br>12  SUN BELT (61.11)</blockquote></p>

<p>A find a couple facets of the current rankings rather fascinating:</p>

<p>- The SEC is the fourth best conference, top-to-bottom? Seriously? The SEC is 20-7 out-of-conference against DI-A teams this year. Granted, three of those seven losses are to the ACC, but... the ACC returned the favor in losing three to the SEC. Sagarin has three SEC teams in his top ten, but the ACC gets the slight nod when you contrast the middle and bottom of each conference, which makes sense when you consider that there are... like... forty-seven teams tied for first in the ACC. </p>

<p>- Is another non-BCS blowout in the offing? Cinderella teams from the WAC (Boise State), Mountain West (Utah, TCU), MAC (Ball State), and C-USA (Tulsa) are all looking to qualify into a BCS bowl this year. Sagarin's ratings would seem to indicate that their resumes might be lacking if and when they get to the big stage. </p>

<p>- The BCS conferences are head-and-shoulders above the non-BCS conferences. The separation between the Big East and Mountain West is statically significant, and I don't think we've seen any rankings that dispute that designation in the last four years.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/sec/007831.php" title="Comment on Sagarin: SEC is the fourth best conference">Comment on Sagarin: SEC is the fourth best conference...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/0RokDAT2yY4/007831.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/sec/007831.php</guid>
<category>SEC</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:05:01 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/sec/007831.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>The Weekender: News, notes, and other stuff to ponder</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>New and notable opinions from the blogs & print:</p>

<p></p>

<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/notre_dame/007783.php">Are the Fighting Irish BCS-bound?</a></p>

<p><br />
<a href="http://blogs.newsobserver.com/accnow/tudors-take-heels-will-run-the-table">North Carolina will finish no worse than 9-3. </a></p>

<p><br />
<a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/pac10/007781.php">Has the Pac10 missed the boat on expansion?</a></p>

<p><br />
<a href="http://www.azstarnet.com/sports/260946">Arizona (ARIZONA?!?!?!?!) sits atop the Pac10, but the real test lies ahead. </a></p>

<p><br />
<a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/notebook?page=notebook/gamedayFinal086">The Razorbacks lack the heart they had when HDN was on the sidelines. </a></p>

<p><br />
<a href="http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/ajc/cfb/entries/2008/10/06/will_tennessee.html?cxntfid=blogs_mr_college_football">Georgia had better be ready for Tennessee.</a></p>

<p><br />
<a href="http://fannation.com/si_blogs/the_sweep/posts/11321">Your next SEC East Champs? Vandy.</a></p>

<p><br />
<a href="http://www.trackemtigers.com/2008/10/6/628921/auburn-s-program-is-at-a-c">Where does Auburn turn now that they have lost to Vandy? </a>  Maybe <a href="http://coacheshotseat.com/coacheshotseatblog/?p=370">it's time for a trip to Cracker Barrel</a>.</p>

<p><br />
<a href="http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/06/heisman-watch-7/">The Heisman may come down to an Oklahoma - Missouri matchup.</a> (And if it does, put me in the Bradford camp.)</p>

<p><br />
It's Texas - OU week, and <a href="http://www.bevosports.com/2008/10/05/texas-and-oklahoma-will-both-be-top-five-for-red-river-shootout/">both teams are ranked in the top five</a>. Historically, that has <a href="http://www.burntorangenation.com/2008/10/5/628912/the-greatest-opportunity">not been a good sign</a> for the Longhorns. </p>

<p><br />
Rumors are spreading at Penn State after JoPa spent another game in the press box and appeared to have trouble with his balance in his press conference. <a href="http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/college/s_591721.html?source=rss&feed=15">Showing up in unmatched shoes didn't help his case, either</a>. </p>

<p><br />
FSU has three sophomores and two true freshman starting on the offensive line - and <a href="http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/sports_college_fsu/2008/10/bobby-bowden-we.html">they won the game for the Noles against Miami</a>. </p>

<p><br />
Finally, <a href="http://blog.nola.com/tulanebeat/2008/10/tulane_gets_knocked_flat_by_ar.html">Army no longer holds the nation's longest losing streak</a>. <br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007784.php" title="Comment on The Weekender: News, notes, and other stuff to ponder">Comment on The Weekender: News, notes, and other stuff to ponder...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/7f3umVIS6ko/007784.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007784.php</guid>
<category>NCAA</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 08:49:40 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007784.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Who are the whiniest coaches in America?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The guys at FoxSports.com have assembled their list of <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/pgStory?contentId=8599970&MSNHPHMA#sport=COLLEGE%20FOOTBALL&photo=8600350">the whiniest coaches in America</a>. I don't think there are any surprises here. </p>

<blockquote>10. Rich Brooks, Kentucky
9. Urban Meyer, Florida
8. Bob Stoops, Oklahoma
7. Mike Stoops, Arizona
6. Nick Saban, Alabama
5. Mike Gundy, Oklahoma State
4. Tommy Tuberville, Auburn
3. Les Miles, LSU
2. Rich Rodriguez, Michigan
1. Steve Spurrier, South Carolina</blockquote>

<p>Anyone see a pattern in this list? Yeah... me neither. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007759.php" title="Comment on Who are the whiniest coaches in America?">Comment on Who are the whiniest coaches in America?...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/jECxvYiBVag/007759.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007759.php</guid>
<category>NCAA</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:12:56 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007759.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could an undefeated Southern Cal miss the BCS?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>America's favorite <em>LA Times </em>columnist Chris Dufresne sounds the alarm that no fan wants to hear: Your team could go undefeated and miss the MNC game. Sure, it's happened before - just ask Tulane and some other team from the southern plains that didn't complain <em>too </em>much. </p>

<p>But three letters make this a code blue, five-alarm red flag alert: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-dufresne22-2008sep22,0,2723874,full.column">USC could miss the BCS title game</a>. </p>

<blockquote>Stunningly, though, only one week after USC's dominating performance against Ohio State left the Trojans as overwhelming favorites to get to the national title game, the watchwords in coming weeks might be: Watch out.

<p>Watch out for the Big 12 and Southeastern conferences.</p>

<p>Watch out for Oklahoma, Missouri, Texas, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana State and maybe Alabama.</blockquote></p>

<p>Dufresne correctly notes that USC basically has "pinatas" left on its schedule. For the first time in recent years, the Trojans do not have an AP top-25 team left on their schedule. Meanwhile, the SEC and Big XII are heavily represented in both polls. </p>

<blockquote>In 2004, USC, Oklahoma and the SEC champion all finished unbeaten and the SEC champion was left out.

<p>You're nuts to think that's going to happen again.</p>

<p>Good as it looks, there is no guarantee that going 12-0 is going to get USC to the BCS title game.</p>

<p>Georgia, at 13-0, could not possibly be denied, nor could any other 13-0 SEC champion.</blockquote></p>

<p>I suspect there are some SEC fans that wouldn't shed a tear if undefeated Big XII and SEC champs played for the crystal trophy while a 13-0 Southern Cal was relegated to the Rose Bowl, no?<br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/usc/007752.php" title="Comment on Could an undefeated Southern Cal miss the BCS?">Comment on Could an undefeated Southern Cal miss the BCS?...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/NHX-iXc4aL0/007752.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/usc/007752.php</guid>
<category>USC</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:59:17 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/usc/007752.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Which BCS teams live any one, anywhere, any time?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A lot of teams <u><em>say</em></u> they are aren't afraid to play anyone, but... well, we all know otherwise. The good folks at ESPN.com put pencil to paper in order to determine <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=formidable/080905">which BCS team best personify the "any one, anywhere, any time" mantra</a> that has taken so many teams from lowliness to greatness. </p>

<p>The results were determined by evaluating each team's regular-season, nonconference schedule against BCS opponents from the time the BCS was formed (1998) through 2007. Since teams don't get to chose their bowl opponents, those games are excluded. </p>

<blockquote>1. Florida State 70.3% 

<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" border="0"><tr class="stathead" style="background:#000"></tr><tr valign="top" class="colhead"><td>No. of nonconf. gms.</td><td>Rec. vs. BCS</td><td>Rec. vs. I-A non-BCS</td><td>Rec. vs. I-AA</td><td>Pct. of gms. vs. BCS</td></tr><tr class="oddrow" valign="top"><td>37</td><td>16-10 (.615)</td><td>9-1 (.900)</td><td>1-0 (1.000)</td><td>.703</td></tr></table>

<p>The Seminoles have begun playing softer nonconference schedules in recent seasons, including -- gasp! -- Division I-AA Citadel in 2005. Nevertheless, over the past decade, no other program has been willing to play the big boys more often out of conference. Of course, Florida State's annual matchup against Miami became conference fare when the Hurricanes joined the ACC in 2004. Notably, FSU is 5-5 in its past 10 meetings with rival Florida, but 0-4 since 2004. We wonder whether Bobby Bowden's crew, coming off back-to-back 7-6 seasons, will continue to scale back schedule difficulty in the coming years. The Seminoles will play more I-AA teams (two) in 2008 than they did in the previous 12 years combined (one).</p>

<p>2. USC 64.9% <br />
3. Georgia Tech 57.1% </p>

<p><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=formidable/080905">&lt; Click here for teams 4-8 &gt;</a></p>

<p>9. Clemson , Duke ,  Penn State , Stanford , Syracuse , Virginia     50% </blockquote></p>

<p><br />
No surprise at the top, really. FSU lived the "any one, anywhere, any time" mantra for the better part of the last two decades. </p>

<p>What is surprising to me is just how dominant the ACC is in the list. Of the top 14 teams, 7 are from the ACC. The Big10 and Pac10 both check in with three teams each. The Big East checks in with one team. How many from the SEC? Try zero. How many from the Big 12? Nada. What's up with that? Look I'm not saying the ACC is better - it clearly isn't this year and hasn't been for several seasons. </p>

<p>But... when it comes to strapping it on against anybody, the ACC leads the pack. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007733.php" title="Comment on Which BCS teams live any one, anywhere, any time?">Comment on Which BCS teams live any one, anywhere, any time?...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/wW6MMEZ_m0A/007733.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007733.php</guid>
<category>NCAA</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:07:12 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007733.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Admissions: Who makes a habit of special admits?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There was a lot of attention on admissions this summer, especially in the wake of <a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/sec/007610.php">the SEC's decision to lower its minimum admission standards</a> to be in line with the NCAA admissions policies.  One of the area's that was not under the microscope (<a href="http://www.thewizofodds.com/the_wiz_of_odds/2008/09/the-game-before-the-games.html">until now, of course</a>) is the case for "special admissions". </p>

<p>The Indy Star contacted FBS schools in an attempt to determine what percentage of football players (and scholarship atheletes, in general) were <a href="http://www.thewizofodds.com/the_wiz_of_odds/2008/09/the-game-before-the-games.html">admitted despite falling below a university's minimum academic standards</a>. </p>

<p>The results? <a href="http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080907/SPORTS/809070375/1069/SPORTS0601&GID=dfCcEQqM6KzyclE1AVDjzBETqGNR/Qwh6Xox0IiG+0Q%3D">Shocking</a>.</p>

<p>At Cal, 95% of the football players admitted during the 2004-2005 year were special admissions. Georgia ('99-'00) and Texas A&M ('04-'05) both had 94% special admissions. On the opposite end of the spectrum, sixteen of the fifty-five responding schools -- including several of the nation's elite football schools -- did not have any special admits at all (Michigan State, Nebraska, North Carolina, Purdue, Texas Tech, Connecticut, Minnesota, Texas, Colorado, Kansas State, Mississippi State, Mississippi, Illinois, Michigan, Virginia, Ohio State). </p>

<p>Here's a <a href="http://www.indystar.com/assets/pdf/BG11724397.PDF">rundown of the schools with special admits</a> that did comply with the request:</p>

<p>Alabama - 21%<br />
Arizona - 33%<br />
Auburn - 12%<br />
Cal - 95%<br />
Floirda - 18%<br />
Florida State - 65%<br />
Georgia - 94%<br />
Georgia Tech - 9%<br />
Indiana - 42%<br />
Iowa - 41%<br />
Iowa State - 21%<br />
Kentucky - 64%<br />
LSU - 82%<br />
Louisville - 38%<br />
Missouri - 61%<br />
NC State - 25%<br />
Oklahoma - 81%<br />
Texas A&M - 94%<br />
Washington - 48%<br />
Washington State - 60%<br />
West Virginia - 23%</p>

<p><br />
<strong>Schools with zero special admissions reported in the football department:</strong><br />
Michigan State, Nebraska, North Carolina, Purdue, Texas Tech, Connecticut, Minnesota, Texas, Colorado, Kansas State, Mississippi State, Mississippi, Illinois, Michigan, Virginia, Ohio State</p>

<p><br />
I'm impressed that some of the higher ranked academic schools aren't taking any special admits. That's impressive. Then again, there's a time and place for special admits. All, college is about lifting people up right?  I don't know where you draw the line, but 95% special admits is insane. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007731.php" title="Comment on Admissions: Who makes a habit of special admits?">Comment on Admissions: Who makes a habit of special admits?...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/Rl0jATAo0Tg/007731.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007731.php</guid>
<category>NCAA</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:25:13 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007731.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Coaches Hot Seat releases Week 1 Hot Seat List</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The first week of college football games are in the books and the results are looking pretty for some coaches, according to <a href="http://www.coacheshotseat.com/CoachesHotSeatRanking.htm">the latest Coaches Hot Seat List</a>. </p>

<p>The most recent update finds Clemson coach Tommy Bowden vaulting to the top of the Hot Seat Rankings, on the strength (or lack thereof) of his team's performance against Alabama. While I'm not sure that TB is wearing the hottest pants in the nation, <a href="http://coacheshotseat.com/coacheshotseatblog/?p=314">Joe goes on to explain the ranking in his blog</a>:</p>

<blockquote>Anything less than 8 wins by Tommy Bowden in 2008, and the Tommy Bowden era is OVER at Clemson.  Tommy Bowden is not only coaching for his job, but if he does not get to 8 wins in 2008, Clemson AD Terry Don Phillips will find himself out of a job as well.  Let’s just be very clear about the Alabama game:  Alabama came out and smashed Clemson in the mouth, and the Clemson players QUIT on Tommy Bowden.  This is not the first time the Clemson players have QUIT on Tommy Bowden, and it will not be the last.  Bowden entered the game against Alabama with four times the talent and four times the experience of the Tide, and the Tigers got their ass handed to them.  For some reason, Tommy Bowden believes that he can continue to put mediocre and underperforming teams onto the field at Clemson and keep his job, but make no doubt about it, Tommy Bowden is now fighting for his coaching career.</blockquote>

<p>Again, I don't know if I would go *that far*, but... then again, if Bowden doesn't post eight wins, then... yeah, he's going out on a rail. All we've heard this season is that this squad is the most talented in epic annals of Tiger football history. If Bowden can't win eight games, then bye-bye. I get that. I'm just not sure that it qualifies him as the #1 target of the college coaching axe. </p>

<p>The rest of the Coaches Hot Seat top ten:</p>

<p>2.  Mike Sherman, Texas A&M<br />
3.  Ty Willingham, Washington<br />
4.  Dave Wannstedt, Pittsburgh<br />
5.  Greg Robinson, Syracuse<br />
6.  Chuck Long, San Diego State<br />
7.  Steve Kragthorpe, Louisville<br />
8.  Phil Fulmer, Tennessee<br />
9.  Al Groh, Virginia<br />
10.  Kirk Ferentz, Iowa</p>

<p><br />
Again, I'm not 100% sure I agree with the list. For example, I think Joe Glenn's days at Wyoming are numbered despite the Cowboys win over Ohio. </p>

<p>Whereas I do not believe that Fulmer can do anything at all to lose his job this year, even if the Vols lose another four or five games this season. Fulmer is - in my opinion - safe this season, as <a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/tennessee/004888.php">evidenced by his recent contract extension</a>. </p>

<p>I'm still not convinced that Steve Kragthorpe has anything to worry about at Lousiville, either. Yes... his team had more turnovers than points, but the UofL AD made a pretty strong case that Kragthorpe was left a mostly bare cupboard of rotting and/or expired goods. While Petrino contends otherwise, at least Kragthorpe has his AD -- who himself is safe by virtue of the rest of the school's athletics and revenues - in his corner. Kragthorpe <a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/louisville/006887.php">rebuilt Tulsa from nothing to three bowls</a> in a state where Golden Hurricane football is *at least* third fiddle, so if there was ever a guy you would want to inherit a bare cupboard....</p>

<p>Meanwhile... way down at #29... is our friend Cheeseburger Charlie Weis. Seriously?! #29?! Dude? Dude. Dude! </p>

<p>Finally, I think the Tim Brewster experiment might be on its last refrains, especially after the attention given to the <a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/minnesota/007703.php">academic failings of his recruits and the prospect of filling a new stadium in 2009</a>. After all, what's going to fill the seats - a .500 team with Brewster or a hot new coach? It's a rhetorical question, but you're free to answer as you will. </p>

<p>Check out the <a href="http://www.coacheshotseat.com/CoachesHotSeatRanking.htm">Coaches Hot Seat</a> for the full rundown. </p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/clemson/007713.php" title="Comment on Coaches Hot Seat releases Week 1 Hot Seat List">Comment on Coaches Hot Seat releases Week 1 Hot Seat List...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/FmPR6u-m0KE/007713.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/clemson/007713.php</guid>
<category>Clemson</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:53:02 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/clemson/007713.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Road Warriors: How far will teams travel in 2008?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Rivals.com's Olin Buchanan pulled out his handy-dandy schedule guide and got onto Mapquest.com to see which college football teams <a href="http://collegefootball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=839384#all">travel the most</a> for the 2008 season. The results are probably not that shocking (does it ruin it if I say #1 is from the WAC?) but there are some surprises when you go through the list. </p>

<p>Surprise #1? Ten of the top 14 travel distances belong to BCS teams. <br />
Surprise #2? Nineteen of the bottom 22 are BCS teams. </p>

<p><em>Note: These are DRIVING DISTANCES, so Hawaii is not included.<br>Note: Because there is no bridge to Hawaii. Seriously.</em></p>

<h4>Which college football teams travel the most miles for games in 2008?</h4>
<p>1. Fresno State	18,190 miles<br>2. UTEP	15,016<br>3. Florida International	14,692<br>4. Florida Atlantic	14,534<br>5. Louisiana Tech	13,648<br>6. Notre Dame	13,348<br>7. Oregon State	13,278<br>8. San Diego State	13,134<br>9. Stanford	12,984<br>10. Idaho	12,798

<p><br />
Again, no big surprise that the most geographically diverse conferences are leading the top spots. After all, the longest roundtrip for a WAC conference game is 4,348 miles. (Idaho at Louisiana Tech)</p>

<p>The one standout is Notre Dame. The Irish go from sea to shining sea with games at Washington, at Boston College, and at USC. </p>

<p>I know what you're thinking and the answer is YES - college football players can accrue frequent flier miles for their travel. (NCAA Bylaws § 16.12.1.11(b))</p>

<p><br />
<h4>Which college football teams travel the fewest miles for games in 2008?</h4><br />
<p>110. Virginia	3,060 miles<br />
111. Nebraska	3,050<br />
112. Mississippi State	3,036<br />
113. Indiana	3,018<br />
114. Duke	2,922<br />
115. Miami (Ohio)	2,874<br />
116. Central Michigan	2,599<br />
117. Ball State	2,464<br />
118. Purdue	2,280<br />
119. N.C. State	1,734</p>

<p><br />
Again, it's not that shocking that the least geographically diverse conferences primarily make up the bottom of the list. The Pack play two games (@ UNC and @ Duke) where the total roundtrip is less than 100 miles... combined! I don't know that it's right to "criticize" the Wolfpack for After all, NC State was <a href="http://www.philsteele.com/FBS%20Info/oppwinpercentage.html">ranked as the #60 most difficult pre-season schedule</a>. The fact that they never cross more than one state line when traveling... bonus. </p>

<p><br />
<h4>Which BCS teams lead their conference in miles traveled for games in 2008?</h4><br />
<p><br />
Pac10 - Oregon State (7th)	13,278<br />
ACC - Miami (21st)	9,952<br />
Big XII - Colorado (22nd)	9,166<br />
Big East - South Florida (42nd)	7,462<br />
Big 10 - Ohio State (46th)	7,364<br />
SEC - Georgia (47th) 	7,264</p>

<p><br />
Check out <a href="http://collegefootball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=839384#all">the whole thing over at Rivals</a>. There's some interesting details on the longest & shortest road trips as well as the complete list of how many miles each team travels this year. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007692.php" title="Comment on Road Warriors: How far will teams travel in 2008?">Comment on Road Warriors: How far will teams travel in 2008?...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/ZeVPzc-WMU8/007692.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007692.php</guid>
<category>NCAA</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:34:55 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007692.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Ranking the top college football coaching jobs</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>With the 2008 college football season starting in less than a week, it's time to check in with the state of college football and rank the top coaching jobs in the country. </p>

<p>I'm basing my list simply on perceived stature, which I believe is generally more static than factors such as current roster, current salary, and other more dynamic factors. </p>

<p><br />
<h4>The Top College Football Coaching Jobs</h4><br />
<p><br />
1. Notre Dame - The most visible head coaching job in the country, with (arguably) the top legacy and traditions in all of college football. </p>

<p>2. Texas</p>

<p>3. Michigan</p>

<p>4. Ohio State</p>

<p>5. Oklahoma</p>

<p>6. USC</p>

<p>7. Nebraska</p>

<p>8. Alabama</p>

<p>9. Florida</p>

<p>10. Georgia</p>

<p>11. Florida State</p>

<p>12. Miami</p>

<p>13. UCLA</p>

<p>14. Penn State</p>

<p>15. Tennessee</p>

<p>16. Texas A&M</p>

<p>17. LSU</p>

<p>18. Iowa</p>

<p>19. Wisconsin</p>

<p>20. Colorado</p>

<p><br />
Just outside the top twenty (alphabetical): Arizona State, Auburn, BYU, Clemson, Georgia Tech, Missouri, Ole Miss, Oregon, Virginia Tech, Washington, WVU</p>

<p>Not that you need an invitation, but... tell me where I'm wrong. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007691.php" title="Comment on Ranking the top college football coaching jobs">Comment on Ranking the top college football coaching jobs...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/f6meXCP6Ges/007691.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007691.php</guid>
<category>NCAA</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:45:35 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007691.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Playboy ranks college football's top 50</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Senator Blutarsky says that <a href="http://blutarsky.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/tidbits-for-a-saturday-morning/">they have articles</a> in Playboy (who knew?) and that the latest issue outlines the Playboy College Football Top 50 pre-season poll.  (<a href="http://www.playboy.com/on-campus/allamerica/football/2008/top-50-football-rankings/">Link</a> -- not recommended for workplace)</p>

<p><br />
<strong>Playboy 2008 College Football Preseason Poll</strong><br />
<i>Predicted finish in parenthesis</i></p>

<p>1. Oklahoma (12-0)<br />
2. Ohio State (11-1)<br />
3. Florida (11-1)<br />
4. Missouri (11-1)<br />
5. USC (11-1)<br />
6. Georgia (10-2)<br />
7. West Virginia (10-2)<br />
8. LSU (9-3)<br />
9. Auburn (9-3)<br />
10. Kansas (9-3)<br />
11. Texas Tech (9-3)<br />
12. Arizona State (9-3)<br />
13. Texas (9-3)<br />
14. Wisconsin (9-3)<br />
15. Clemson (9-3)<br />
16. Utah (9-3)<br />
17. Cincinnati (9-4)<br />
18. Virginia Tech (8-4)<br />
19. Arkansas (8-4)<br />
20. Boise State (9-3)<br />
21. Illinois (8-4)<br />
22. Kansas State (8-4)<br />
23. Tennessee (8-4)<br />
24. Oregon State (8-4)<br />
25. Georgia Tech (8-4)<br />
26. BYU (10-2)<br />
27. Arizona (8-4)<br />
28. California (8-4)<br />
29. Rutgers (8-5)<br />
30. Central Florida (8-4)<br />
31. Michigan (7-5)<br />
32. Penn State (7-5)<br />
33. Nebraska (7-5)<br />
34. Oklahoma State (7-5)<br />
35. Colorado (7-5)<br />
36. Purdue (7-5)<br />
37. Connecticut (7-5)<br />
38. Louisville (7-5)<br />
39. Oregon (7-5)<br />
40. Alabama (7-5)<br />
41. Mississippi State (7-5)<br />
42. South Carolina (7-5)<br />
43. Florida State (7-5)<br />
44. UCLA (7-5)<br />
45. Boston College (7-5)<br />
46. Texas A&M (7-5)<br />
47. Miami (7-5)<br />
48. Virginia (7-5)<br />
49. Notre Dame (7-5)<br />
50. New Mexico (7-5)</p>

<p>In honor of Playboys presumptive champion, Oklahoma, we proudly link to<a href="http://www.playboy.com/girls/coeds/features/big12/oklahoma.html"> Playboy's Oklahoma Sooners model</a> (NSFW) in <a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/big12/006634.php">Playboy's Girls of the Big 12</a> college pictorial <a href="http://www.dailyniner.com/big12.shtml">edition</a> (~very~ NSFW). </p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007678.php" title="Comment on Playboy ranks college football's top 50">Comment on Playboy ranks college football's top 50...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/uABNCl9Dxi0/007678.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007678.php</guid>
<category>NCAA</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:44:06 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007678.php</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Who spends the most money on recruiting?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Here's a great find by <a href="http://thewizardofodds.blogspot.com">Da Wiz</a>... who <a href="http://chronicle.com/temp/email2.php?id=qsMjnbxncyhpzdpGqdzyqxM9hZJffwVt">spends the most money</a> on recruiting?</p>

<p>While the study takes all recruiting into account (not just college football) it's interesting to contrast who spent what on how successful their efforts are percieved to have been by contrasting them to the Rivals.com <a href="http://rivals100.rivals.com/TeamRank.asp?postype=0&sort=0&year=2007">college football team recruiting rankings</a>. </p>

<p><br />
<h4>College Recruiting Expenses vs. College Football Recruiting Rankings</h4></p>

<center><table><tr><td align="center" width="30%"><b>SCHOOL</b></td><td align="center" width="35%"><b>2006-2007 SPEND</b></td><td align="center" width="35%"><b>2007 Recruiting Ranking</b></td></tr><tr><td>Tennessee</td><td><b>$2,005,700</b></td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Notre Dame</td><td>$1,758,300</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>Florida</td><td>$1,451,400</td><td><b>1</b></td></tr><tr><td>Auburn</td><td>$1,374,900</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>Kansas State</td><td>$1,316,700</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>Georgia</td><td>$1,284,000</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>Nebraska</td><td>$1,275,000</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>Arkansas</td><td>$1,259,700</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>Duke</td><td>$1,245,300</td><td>78</td></tr><tr><td>Ohio State</td><td>$1,236,800</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td><b>DI-A Median</b></td><td><b>$632,600</b></td><td></td></tr></table></center>

<p><br><p><br>A few other notables from the top-twenty in spending:</p>

<p>Texas - $1,156,800<br />
Oklahoma - $1,120,800<br />
Georgia Tech - $1,111,900<br />
West Virginia - $1,094,200</p>

<p><br />
Here's a few interesting takeaways from the report:</p>

<p>- Recruiting budgets at the top-twenty spenders repesents just 1-3% of the athletic departments budget. <br />
- 21 schools spent more than $1 million on recruiting. <br />
- USF had the lowest spend among BCS schools at less than $500,000.<br />
- Louisiana-Monroe spent the least in DI-A - $134,300.<br />
- Of the BCS conferences, the SEC spends the most on recruiting ($13,129,700) while the Big East spent the least ($6,125,700). </p>

<p><br />
The complete list of spending by school is <a href="http://chronicle.com/temp/email2.php?id=qsMjnbxncyhpzdpGqdzyqxM9hZJffwVt">online</a>... enjoy. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[&copy; www.fanblogs.com<p><a href="http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007653.php" title="Comment on Who spends the most money on recruiting?">Comment on Who spends the most money on recruiting?...</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Fanblogs/arizona-Pac10CollegeFootball-Fanblogscom/~3/rpD-iOWxJww/007653.php</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007653.php</guid>
<category>NCAA</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:20:39 -0500</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fanblogs.com/ncaa/007653.php</feedburner:origLink></item>


</channel>
</rss>
